Bibliography - Cognitive Bias in Forensic Science

Budowle, B. et al., A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement. J Forensic Sci, 54(4), 2009.

Busey, T. & Dror, I.E. Special abilities and vulnerabilities in forensic expertise. In A. McRoberts (Ed.) Friction Ridge Sourcebook. Washington DC, USA: NIJ Press. (in press)

Byrd, J.S., Confirmation bias, ethics, and mistakes in forensics. ???

Charlton, D., Fraser-Mackenzie, P., & Dror, I. E., Emotional experiences and motivating factors associated with fingerprint analysis. J Forensic Sci, 55 (3) (in press).

Cooley, C.M., Psychological influences and the state employed forensic examiner: How to elicit evidence concerning observer effect errors through cross-examination and discovery. Illinois Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Newsletter Summer, 2003.

Dror, I. E. Perceptual, Cognitive, and Psychological Elements Involved in Expert Identification, Friction Ridge Sourcebook, SWGFAST, NIJ, In Press. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/225320.htm

Dror, I. E. & Mnookin, J. The use of technology in human expert domains: Challenges and risks arising from the use of automated fingerprint identification systems in forensics. Law, Probability and Risk. (in press).

Dror, I.E. and Fraser-Mackenzie, P.A.F., Cognitive Biases in Human Perception, Judgment, and Decision Making: Bridging Theory and the Real World in Criminal Investigative Failures, Ed. Rossmo, K., Taylor & Francis, 2008.

Dror, I.E. How can Francis Bacon help forensic science? The four idols of human biases. Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology (in press).

Dror, I.E. Paradoxical functional degradation in human expertise. In N. Kapur, Pascual-Leone, & V. S. Ramachandran (Eds.) The Paradoxical Brain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (in press).

Dror, I.E., and Cole, S.A., The vision in ‘blind’ Justice: Expert perception, judgment and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in press.

Dror, I.E., Charlton, D., Peron, A., Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identification, Forensic Science International, 156, 2006.

Dror, I.E., Charlton, D., Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic identification 56(4), 2006.

Dror, I.E., Peron, A.E., Hind, S-L., Charlton, D., When emotions get the better of us: The effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 2005.

Dror, I.E., Rosenthal, R., Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. J Forensic Sci, 53(4), 2008.

Evett, I., Evaluation and professionalism. Science and Justice 49, 2009.

Forrest, R., Context-free forensic science. Science and Justice 44(2), 2004.

Giannelli, P.C., Confirmation Bias, Criminal Justice, 22(3), 2007.

Hall, L.J. and Player, E., Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making? Forensic Science International, 181, 2008.

Dror, I.E. On proper research and understanding of the interplay between bias and decision outcomes, Forensic Science International, 191, 2009.

Hall, L.J. and Player, E., The value of practitioner research in the field of fingerprint analysis, Forensic Science International, 191, 2009.

Saks, M.J. Concerning L.J. Hall, E. Player, ‘‘Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision making?’’ Forensic Science International, 191, 2009.

Hall, L.J. Player, E. The value of practitioner research in the field of fingerprint analysis (2). Forensic Sci. Int. 191, 2009.

Hartl, D.L., and Fairbanks, D.J., Mud Sticks: On the Alleged Falsification of Mendel’s Data in Perspectives in Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Eds. Crow, J.F. and Dove, W.F., Genetics Society of America, 2007.

Hasel, S, Kassin, L., On the presumption of evidentiary independence Psychological Science; Can Confessions Corrupt Eyewitness Identifications? 20(1), 2009

Kerstholt J.H., Paashuis R., Sjerps, M. Shoe print examinations: Effects of expectation, complexity and experience, Forensic Science International, 165, 2006.

Krane, D.E., Ford, F., Gilder, J.R., Inman, K., Jamieson, A., Koppl, R., Kornfield, I.L., Risinger, D.M., Rudin, N., Taylor, M.C., Thompson W.C., Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation, J Forensic Sci 53(4), 2008.

Wells J.D. Commentary on: Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. J Forensic Sci, 54(2) 2009.

Krane, D.E., Ford, F., Gilder, J.R., Inman, K., Jamieson, A., Koppl, R., Kornfield, I.L., Risinger, D.M., Rudin, N., Taylor, M.C., Thompson W.C., Authors’ Response, J Forensic Sci, 54(2) 2009.

Ostrum B. Commentary on: Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. J Forensic Sci, 54(6), 2009.

Krane, D.E., Ford, F., Gilder, J.R., Inman, K., Jamieson, A., Koppl, R., Kornfield, I.L., Risinger, D.M., Rudin, N., Taylor, M.C., Thompson W.C., Authors’ Response, J Forensic Sci, 54(6), 2009.

Langenburg, G., Champod, C., and Wertheim, P., Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V Methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons J Forensic Sci, 54(3) 2009.

Mankevich, A. Blind verification; Does it compromise the conformance of ACE-V methodology to the scientific method? Chesapeake Examiner 45(2), 2007.

Miller, Larry S., Bias among forensic document examiners: A need for procedural changes. J Police Science and Administration, 12(4), 1984.

Miller, Larry S., Procedural bias in forensic science examinations of human hair. Law and Human Behavior 11(2) 157, 1987.

Phillips V.L., Saks M.J., Peterson J.L., The application of signal detection theory to decision-making in forensic science. J Forensic Sci; 46(2) 2001.

Risinger, D.M., Saks, M.J. Thompson, W.C., Rosenthal, R., The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90(1) 2002.

Saks, M.J., Risinger, D.M., Rosenthal, R., Thompson, W.C., Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States. Science & Justice, 43(2), 2003.

Schiffer B., Champod C., The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualization. Forensic Sci Int,167, 2007.

Stacey, R.M., A report on the erroneous fingerprint individualization in the Madrid train bombing case. Journal of Forensic Identification, 54, 2004.

Thompson WC. A sociological perspective on the science of forensic DNA testing. UC Davis Law Rev, 30(4), 1997.

Thompson, W.C. and Cole, S.A., Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence. In M. Costanzo, D. Krauss & K. Pezdek (Eds.) Expert Psychological Testimony for the Courts. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates. 2007.

Thompson, W.C. and Ford, S., The meaning of a match: Sources of ambiguity in the interpretation of DNA prints. In J. Farley & J. Harrington (Eds.) Forensic DNA Technology. New York: CRC Press, Inc., 1991.

Thompson, W.C., Accepting Lower Standards: The National Research Council’s Second Report on Forensic DNA Evidence. Jurimetrics 37(4), 1997.

Thompson, W.C., Observer Effects, Context Effects and Confirmation Bias in Forensic Science in Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science, Eds. Jamieson, A., and Moenssens, A., John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

Thompson, W.C., Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation, Law Probability and Risk, 2009

Thompson, W.C., Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of DNA evidence: Three case studies. Genetica 96, 1995.

Thomson M.A., Bias and quality control in forensic science; a cause for concern. J Forensic Sci, 10(3), 1974.

USDOJ OIJ, A review of the FBI’s handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case, 2006.

Vokey, J., Tangen, J., & Cole, S., On the preliminary psychophysics of fingerprint identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 2009

Whitman, G., Koppl, R., Institutional Bias in Forensic Science. In Press??